Fourhorn et al v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 116

Minute ORDER granting in part and denying in part 111 Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order or to Extent Expert Deadlines and granting in part and denying in part 114 Defendants' Joinder in the Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order or to Extend Expert Deadlines. Discovery due by 8/31/2009, Dismissal Paper due by 9/25/2009, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/11/09.(gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01693-MSK-KLM CHRISTINA ANN FOURHORN, MUSE JAMA, JOSE ERNESTO IBARRA, DENNIS MICHAEL SMITH, SAMUEL POWELL MOORE, and DEDE DAVIS, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MARK DALVIT, a detective with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, CURT PETERSON, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, JOHN BISHOP, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, ALAN SIRHAL, a Denver Sheriff Department deputy, in his individual capacity, CHOICE JOHNSON, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, ANDREW RICHMOND, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, PAUL ORTEGA, a sergeant with the Denver Sheriff Department, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE 1, a Denver Police Department officer, whose identity is unknown, in his individual capacity, and JOHN DOE 2, a Denver Police Department officer, whose identity is unknown, in his individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion of Plaintiffs and Defendant City and County of Denver to Amend Scheduling Order or, in the Alternative, to Extend Expert Deadlines [Docket No. 111; Filed March 9, 2009] and Defendants Dalvit, Peterson & Bishop's Joinder in the Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, or, in the Alternative, to Extend Expert Deadlines [Docket No. 114; Filed March 10, 2009] (the "Motions"). A case moratorium put in place to facilitate settlement was recently lifted by the Court due to the breakdown of settlement negotiations [Docket No. 107]. During the moratorium, all case deadlines were effectively stayed, and the parties did not engage in discovery. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The extensions of time requested by the parties create too much pressure on the Final Pretrial Conference date set by the Honorable Marcia S. Krieger for December 1, 2009. This Court has no authority to change the date of the Final Pretrial Conference. Accordingly, the Scheduling Order entered on October 2, 2008 [Docket No. 37] is amended to extend the following deadlines: · · · · · · Non-Expert Written Discovery Deadline Non-Expert Discovery Deadline Expert Designations and Disclosures Rebuttal Expert Designations and Disclosures Expert Discovery Deadline Dispositive Motions Deadline April 30, 2009 July 1, 2009 July 1, 2009 July 21, 2009 August 31, 2009 September 25, 2009 Dated: March 11, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?