Fourhorn et al v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 215

MINUTE ORDER granting 206 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Motions and for Briefing on Issues Relating to Confidentiality Designations; granting 207 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Motion fo r Protective Order. The Court agrees that issues involving the confidentiality of Defendants documents are best resolved via consolidated briefing. Any current deadlines which conflict with the schedule are vacated. Plaintiffs and Intervenor shall respond to Defendants 183 Motion for Protective Order on or before 08/10/2009, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 06/29/09.(wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01693-MSK-KLM CHRISTINA ANN FOURHORN, MUSE JAMA, JOSE ERNESTO IBARRA, DENNIS MICHAEL SMITH, SAMUEL POWELL MOORE, and DEDE DAVIS, Plaintiffs, ANTONIO CARLOS SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MARK DALVIT, a detective with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, CURT PETERSON, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, JOHN BISHOP, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, ALAN SIRHAL, a Denver Sheriff Department deputy, in his individual capacity, CHOICE JOHNSON, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, ANDREW RICHMOND, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, PAUL ORTEGA, a sergeant with the Denver Sheriff Department, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE 1, a Denver Police Department officer, whose identity is unknown, in his individual capacity, and JOHN DOE 2, a Denver Police Department officer, whose identity is unknown, in his individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Motions and Briefing on Issues Relating to Confidentiality Designations [Docket No.

206; Filed June 25, 2009] ("Motion to Consolidate") and Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Motion for Protective Order [Docket No. 207; Filed June 25, 2009] ("Motion to Enlarge"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Consolidate [#206] is GRANTED. The Court agrees that issues involving the confidentiality of Defendants' documents are best resolved via consolidated briefing. Accordingly, · Plaintiffs and Intervenor shall file a third notice of objections to Defendants's confidentiality designations, if necessary, on or before July 10, 2009. · Defendants shall either (1) file a second motion for protective order on or before July 24, 2009, or (2) withdraw their Motion for Protective Order [#177] and file a single motion consolidating the confidentiality dispute on or before July 24, 2009. · Plaintiffs and Intervenor shall respond to Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [#177] (if it remains pending), any additional motion for protective order pertaining to confidentiality issues, and Defendant Ortega's Motion to Seal Exhibits [#186] on or before on or before August 17, 2009. · Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiffs' and Intervenor's response (if any) on or before September 4, 2009. · Any current deadlines which conflict with the above schedule are vacated.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Enlarge [#207] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs and Intervenor shall respond to Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [#183] on or before August 10, 2009. Dated: June 29, 2009 2