Fourhorn et al v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 263

MINUTE ORDER granting 256 Defendant's Partially Unopposed Motion to Resolve Motion for Protective Order Regarding Plaintiffs' Excessive Interrogatories. The Court accepts the parties agreement namely that Defendants will answer interroga tory nos. 36, 37 and 47 from Plaintiffs Eighth Set of Discovery Requests and Plaintiffs will withdraw their remaining interrogatories propounded pursuant to the Requests and considers the discovery dispute to be resolved. Motion No. 183 is deemed to be WITHDRAWN, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 08/24/09.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01693-MSK-KLM CHRISTINA ANN FOURHORN, MUSE JAMA, JOSE ERNESTO IBARRA, DENNIS MICHAEL SMITH, SAMUEL POWELL MOORE, and DEDE DAVIS, Plaintiffs, ANTONIO CARLOS SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MARK DALVIT, a detective with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, CURT PETERSON, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, JOHN BISHOP, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, ALAN SIRHAL, a Denver Sheriff Department deputy, in his individual capacity, CHOICE JOHNSON, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, ANDREW RICHMOND, an officer with the Denver Police Department, in his individual capacity, PAUL ORTEGA, a sergeant with the Denver Sheriff Department, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE 1, a Denver Police Department officer, whose identity is unknown, in his individual capacity, and JOHN DOE 2, a Denver Police Department officer, whose identity is unknown, in his individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Partially Unopposed Motion to Resolve Motion for Protective Order Regarding Plaintiffs' Excessive Interrogatories [Docket No. 256; Filed August 21, 2009] (the "Motion"). Despite the cumbersome title, the Court interprets the Motion to be a request to withdraw Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Regarding Plaintiffs' Excessive Interrogatories [Docket No. 183] ("Motion No. 183"). Although the Motion purports to be "partially unopposed" due to unidentified language used by Defendants to which Plaintiffs object, the parties agree that Motion No. 183 is now moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Court accepts the parties' agreement namely that Defendants will answer interrogatory nos. 36, 37 and 47 from Plaintiffs' Eighth Set of Discovery Requests ("Requests") and Plaintiffs will withdraw their remaining interrogatories propounded pursuant to the Requests and considers the discovery dispute to be resolved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion No. 183 is deemed to be WITHDRAWN. Dated: August 24, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?