Technology Partners LLC v. Golden Key LLC et al

Filing 103

MINUTE ORDER granting 101 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Response Memorandum of Law to FRCP 15 Motion for Leave to File Proposed Second Amended Complaint of Technology Partners LLC, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/26/09.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01707-MSK-BNB (Consolidated with 08-cv-01792-MSK-BNB) TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN KEY LLC, a New York limited liability company, WONDERLAND Capital Corp., a New York corporation, JUMBOHAWK DRILLING LLC, SIPADA, INC., a New York corporation, and X-CLEARING CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, Defendants. X-CLEARING CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, GOLDEN KEY LLC, WONDERLAND CAPITAL CORPORATION, MARINE EXPLORATION, INC., a Colorado corporation, NEXT LEVEL CONSULTING, ERIC CUSIMANO, MERCHANTILE ASCENDENCY, INC., a Texas corporation, PERSHING LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, FAGENSON & CO., a New York corporation, LEGENT CLEARING, LLC, a Nebraska corporation, and INVESTORS VOICE, LLC, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Leave to File Reply to Response Memorandum of Law to FRCP 15 Motion for Leave to File Proposed Second Amended Complaint of Technology Partners LLC [docket no. 101, filed January 23, 2009] (the "Motion"). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and plaintiff Technology Partners LLC may file a reply to the Motion for Leave to File Proposed Second Amended Complaint, not to exceed five (5) pages. DATED: January 26, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?