Technology Partners LLC v. Golden Key LLC et al

Filing 129

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Motion Hearing held on 9/17/2009 122 Motion for Order to Approve Settlment Agreements is DENIED with leave to renew. Other deadline(s) and information as set forth in the Minutes. (Court Reporter Paul Zuckerman) (mskcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER Courtroom Deputy: Court Reporter: Patricia Glover Paul Zuckerman Date: September 17, 2009 Civil Action No. 08-cv-01707-MSK-BNB consolidated with Civil Action No. 08-cv-001792-MSK-BNB P a r t i e s: TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC, v. GOLDEN KEY LLC, WONDERLAND CAPITAL CORP., JUMBOHAWK DRILLING LLC; SIPADA, INC., PAUL GIARMOLEO, and HUGH AUSTIN, Defendants, and GOLDEN KEY, LLC, WONDERLAND CAPITAL CORP., JUMBOHAWK DRILLING, LLC, and SPIADA, INC., Counterclaim/Crossclaim Plaintiffs, v. TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC, X-CLEARING CORP., Counterclaim Defendants, MARINE EXPLORATION, INC., Crossclaim Defendant, and Michael Littman Patrick Kanouff Dean Webb (by telephone) Counsel Appearing: John Schlie Courtroom Minutes Judge Marcia S. Krieger Page 2 PAUL ENRIGHT, and ROBERT STEVENS Third-party Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES HEARING: 10:33 a.m. Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreements (Doc. #122) Court in session. The Court addresses the parties' request for settlement approval (Doc #122) Statement from counsel Schlie and Kanouff. The parties agree that a conference with Magistrate Judge Boland would be helpful to finalize the documentation and will make arrangements to do so. ORDER: By December 16, 2009, the parties will submit whatever additional documenation they deem necessary to accomplish their goals to close this case. The Joint Motion at (Doc. #122) is DENIED with leave to renew. Court in recess. 10:59 a.m. Total Time: 26 minutes. Hearing concluded.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?