Faircloth v. Hartman et al
MINUTE ORDER. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Resubmit Order to Cause for Injunction 89 filed 01/20/2009. Defendants are to respond to the Second Amended Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 89 on or before 02/12/2009. Plaintiff shall file his reply on or before 03/02/2009. Plaintiffs Amended Order for Cause for an Injunction 60 filed 11/20/2008 is DENIED AS MOOT by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/21/2009.(sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01742-PAB-KLM JAMES ARTHUR FAIRCLOTH, Plaintiff, v. LT. HARTMAN, Administrative Lt. For Health Services, ELAINE MEYERS, Health Services Administrator, and DR. PITCHER (Medical Doctor), LT. COURTNEY, and DR. MOZER, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Resubmit `Order to Cause for Injunction' [Docket No. 89; Filed January 20, 2009] (the "Motion"). The Court construes this Motion as a Second Amended Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are to respond to the Second Amended Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [Docket No. 89] on or before February 12, 2009. Plaintiff shall file his reply on or before March 2, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Order for Cause for an Injunction [Docket No. 60; Filed November 20, 2008] is DENIED AS MOOT. Dated: January 21, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?