Catman v. Brill
Filing
62
MINUTE ORDER granting 59 Plaintiffs Request [Motion] for Clarification by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/12/2009.(sah, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01770-LTB-MEH NORMAN CATMAN, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA (C.C.A.), and JOHN AND JANE DOES #1 - #15, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on January 12, 2009. Plaintiff's Request [Motion] for Clarification [filed January 7, 2009; docket #59] is granted. At the time Plaintiff filed his motion to compel (November 6, 2008), the only defendant in the action was Warden Brill. Following Defendant Brill's dismissal from this matter, all motions pertaining to Defendant Brill were denied as moot.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
