I'MNAEDAFT, LTD. v. Intelligent Office System, LLC., The et al

Filing 129

ORDER granting 79 Plaintiffs Opposed Motion for Leave to File its Fourth Amended Complaint by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/12/2009.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-01804-LTB-KLM I'MNAEDAFT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE INTELLIGENT OFFICE SYSTEM, LLC, RALPH S. GREGORY and GREG BROOKS, Defendants/Counterclaimants, and THE INTELLIGENT OFFICE SYSTEMS, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. RONALD CLARKE, Third-Party Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ___________________________________________________________________________ As stated on the record during the May 12, 2009 scheduling hearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) The parties' cross-motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a) [Doc # 51 & # 61], are set for a five-day hearing to commence on August 17, 2009. Additionally, I rule that this hearing is consolidated with the trial on the merits as to the issues raised and decided related to injunction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2);

(2) A hearing is set for July 1, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. to specify and define the issues to be decided during the injunction trial of this case. As a result, the parties shall file a Joint Statement of the Issues ­ which sets forth the stipulated issues to be decided at the injunction trial, as well as the contested issues sought to be determined by each party ­ on or before June 26, 2009; (3) A final trial preparation conference for the trial on injunctive relief is set for July 24, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. In anticipation of that hearing, the parties shall have an exhibit conference in order to stipulate as to admission and/or authenticity of the exhibits. The parties shall then file the following on or before July 21, 2009: A) Final Exhibit Lists listing the stipulated exhibits and contested exhibits, and setting forth the claimed applicable evidentiary rule of exclusion; B) Final Witness Lists; and C) Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; (4) Finally, upon the parties' agreement, I GRANT Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to File its Fourth Amended Complaint [Doc # 79]. Dated: May 12 , 2009, in Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

2