I'MNAEDAFT, LTD. v. Intelligent Office System, LLC., The et al

Filing 129

ORDER granting 79 Plaintiffs Opposed Motion for Leave to File its Fourth Amended Complaint by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/12/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-01804-LTB-KLM I'MNAEDAFT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE INTELLIGENT OFFICE SYSTEM, LLC, RALPH S. GREGORY and GREG BROOKS, Defendants/Counterclaimants, and THE INTELLIGENT OFFICE SYSTEMS, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. RONALD CLARKE, Third-Party Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ___________________________________________________________________________ As stated on the record during the May 12, 2009 scheduling hearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) The parties' cross-motions seeking preliminary injunctive relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a) [Doc # 51 & # 61], are set for a five-day hearing to commence on August 17, 2009. Additionally, I rule that this hearing is consolidated with the trial on the merits as to the issues raised and decided related to injunction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2); (2) A hearing is set for July 1, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. to specify and define the issues to be decided during the injunction trial of this case. As a result, the parties shall file a Joint Statement of the Issues which sets forth the stipulated issues to be decided at the injunction trial, as well as the contested issues sought to be determined by each party on or before June 26, 2009; (3) A final trial preparation conference for the trial on injunctive relief is set for July 24, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. In anticipation of that hearing, the parties shall have an exhibit conference in order to stipulate as to admission and/or authenticity of the exhibits. The parties shall then file the following on or before July 21, 2009: A) Final Exhibit Lists listing the stipulated exhibits and contested exhibits, and setting forth the claimed applicable evidentiary rule of exclusion; B) Final Witness Lists; and C) Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; (4) Finally, upon the parties' agreement, I GRANT Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to File its Fourth Amended Complaint [Doc # 79]. Dated: May 12 , 2009, in Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?