Cohen v. Mukasey

Filing 59

ORDER. On 04/12/2010, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals entered its Order and Judgment and directed issuance of the Mandate forthwith. In the Order and Judgment, the Court granted the Governments Motion to Dismiss in part stating because the releas e/bond claims and the requests for declaratory and injunctive relief are moot, we vacate those portions of the District Courts Order dealing with these claims and remand with instructions to dismiss those claims. The Court affirmed dismissal of the claims seeking damages. Finally, the Motion to Restore was denied. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED that Solomon Ben-Tov Cohens release/bond claims are DISMISSED. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/13/2010. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-01844-LTB-CBS SOLOMON BEN-TOV COHEN MA (CANTAB), Petitioner, v. THERESA HUNT, Warden of GEO-ICE Detention Facility, Aurora, Colorado, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ On April 12, 2010, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals entered its Order and Judgment and directed issuance of the Mandate forthwith. In the Order and Judgment, the Court granted the Government's Motion to Dismiss in part stating "because the release/bond claims and the requests for declaratory and injunctive relief are moot, we vacate those portions of the District Court's Order dealing with these claims and remand with instructions to dismiss those claims." The Court affirmed dismissal of the claims seeking damages. Finally, the Motion to Restore was denied. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED that Solomon Ben-Tov Cohen's release/bond claims are DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: April 13, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?