Guidry v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/15/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/16/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/1/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/30/09. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01846-AP GEORGE J. GUIDRY,
Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Ann J. Atkinson 7960 South Ireland Way Aurora, CO 80016 303-680-1881 AtkinsonAJ@aol.com For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-1570 (303) 844-0770 (facsimile) firstname.lastname@example.org
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 12/22/08 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 1/2/09 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 3/2/09
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the record is complete and accurate.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
OTHER MATTERS The parties state that there are no other matters.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE 5/15/09 A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 6/16/09 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 7/1/09
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED: March 30, 2009 BY THE COURT: S/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/Ann J. Atkinson Ann J. Atkinson 7960 South Ireland Way Aurora, CO 80016 303-680-1881 AtkinsonAJ@aol.com
For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov s/ Debra J. Meachum Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-1570 Debra.email@example.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?