Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation v. Superloads, Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER denying 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave Of Court To File A Second Amended Complaint Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/20/09.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Zita L. Weinshienk Civil Action No. 08-cv-01959-ZLW-MEH NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERLOADS, INC., Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Leave Of Court To File A Second Amended Complaint Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (Doc. No. 27). The Court has determined that this motion can be resolved on the parties' briefs without a hearing. The Scheduling Order deadline for amendment of pleadings in this case was January 5, 2009. Plaintiff filed the present motion to amend on January 23, 2009. Although, generally, leave to amend pleadings shall be freely granted when justice so requires,1 Plaintiff has not shown good cause to amend its pleading after the Scheduling Order deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Accordingly, it is 1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). 1 ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Leave Of Court To File A Second Amended Complaint Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (Doc. No. 27) is denied. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 20th day of March, 2009. BY THE COURT: _________________________________ ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?