Lyndon Property Insurance Company v. Weinman et al

Filing 82

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 7/29/2009 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Stipulated Protective Order signed. Order to Comply with D.C.Colo.L.Civ.R. 7.2 entered. Motion by Credit Union of Texas to Amend Ord er Dismissing the Eighth Counterclaim (Now Sixth Amended Counterclaim) of Credit Union of Texas and for, filed June 8, 2009 74 , is granted. Counsel to submit an agreed proposed scheduling order by August 18, 2009. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: July 29, 2009 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 08-cv-01972-RPM LYNDON PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant, v. CREDIT UNION OF TEXAS; Defendant and Counter-claimant. W. Randolph Barnhart Robert M. Horowitz John C. Parks Gregory F. Harley Kevin S. Neiman ____________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________ Scheduling Conference 10:56 a.m. ORDERED: Court in session. Stipulated Protective Order signed. Order to Comply with D.C.Colo.L.Civ.R. 7.2 entered. Motion by Credit Union of Texas to Amend Order Dismissing the Eighth Counterclaim (Now Sixth Amended Counterclaim) of Credit Union of Texas and for, filed June 8, 2009 [74], is granted. Discussion regarding related bankruptcy proceedings, discovery (phase) and case facts. Counsel state the liquidation reorganization bankruptcy plan was confirmed and it is in the liquidation process. Counsel agree to phase discovery. ORDERED: 11:30 a.m. Counsel to submit an agreed proposed scheduling order by August 18, 2009. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 34 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?