Griffin v. Heuser et al

Filing 39

ORDER. The recommendation is accepted and Defendant Mr. Gregory A. Maceau Law Offices, LLCs Motion to Dismiss 5 and Defendants Joseph R. Winston & Winston Law Firms Motion to Dismiss 13 are GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED as to these Defendants only for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/24/2009.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-02070-LTB-BNB

MARY LEE GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. MR. GORDON J. HEUSER & HEUSER LLP AT LAW, MR. JOSEPH R. WINSTON & WINSTON LAW FIRM, MR. GREGORY A. MACEAU LAW OFFICES LLC, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on August 18, 2009 (Doc 32). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Defendant Mr. Gregory A. Maceau Law Offices, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc 5) and Defendants Joseph R. Winston & Winston Law Firm's Motion to Dismiss (Doc 13) are GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED as to these Defendants only for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: September 24, 2009