Hughes v. Titan Technology Partners, Limited

Filing 80

ORDER granting 74 Defendant Titan Technology Partners, Limiteds Motion for Protective Order to the extent stated herein. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/3/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02099-WYD-MEH KARA HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. TITAN TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LTD., Defendant. ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Titan Technology Partners, Limited's Motion for Protective Order [filed August 28, 2009; docket #74]. In the conclusion of the Motion, Defendant offers three requests to the Court: one, declare that the deposition of Michael Vadini is governed by the Stipulated Protective Order already entered in this matter; two, order that exhibit eleven of Mr. Vadini's deposition and the recording of the deposition are subject to the Stipulated Protective Order; or three, impose certain restrictions and limitations on the recording of Mr. Vadini's deposition. In response, Plaintiff accepts the second request for relief described by Defendant without objection. (Docket #79 at 1.) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that deposition exhibit eleven and the audiovisual recording of Mr. Vadini's deposition are subject to and covered by the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order [filed July 9, 2009; docket #52]. The Court GRANTS Defendant Titan Technology Partners, Limited's Motion for Protective Order [filed August 28, 2009; docket #74] to the extent stated herein. Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 3rd day of September, 2009. BY THE COURT: Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?