Grenemyer v. McFadin et al

Filing 13

ORDER OF OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Should the parties desire to have the pending dispositive motion referred to a magistrate judge for final determination, they shall file a unanimous consent by all parties within ten days of the date of this Order, failing which the motion shall be determined by the undersigned. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/9/09. (msksec, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 08-cv-02156-MSK-CBS CONNIE GRENEMYER Plaintiff, v. STACY L. McFADIN, and LAURIE D. McFADIN, d/b/a TWO BAR WEST, Defendants. ORDER OF OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. The Court FINDS that the following dispositive motion (#6) has been pending in this matter for six months or longer and due to press of criminal cases may not be determined in as expedited a manner as the undersigned would like. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.3(A), (B) and (D), parties may consent to final determination of the motion by a magistrate judge, selected by random draw. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that should the parties desire to have the pending dispositive motions referred to a magistrate judge for final determination, they shall file a unanimous consent by all parties within ten days of the date of this Order, failing which the motion shall be determined by the undersigned. DATED this 9th day of April, 2009. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?