Cartinelle v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 1/6/2010.Granting 23 Motion for clarification, or, in the alternative, motion for extension of time to answer or respond. The defendants shall answer o r respond to amended complaint on or before February 8, 2010. Defendants oral motion to stay discovery pending the determination of anticipated motions for misjoinder and/or to dismiss is denied as stated on the record. (Court Reporter FTR-G.Mattei.) (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND Civil Action No. 08-cv-02223-REB- BNB Courtroom Deputy: Geneva D. Mattei Date: January 6, 2010 FTR BNB COURTROOM A-401
INGRID M. CARTINELLE, PAMELA K. HELSPER, DWAIN BROWN, and JOHN F. NOBLE, Plaintiff(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, and (TSA) JANET NAPOLITANO, Defendant(s).
Patricia Jo Stone
COURTROOM MINUTES HEARING: MOTIONS Court in Session: 9:57 a.m.
Appearance of counsel. Plaintiffs Ingrid M. Cartinelle, Pamela K. Helsper, and John F. Noble present. Court's opening remarks. Argument presented. ORDERED: Motion for clarification, or, in the alternative, motion for extension of time to answer or respond [Doc. # 23; filed December 21, 2009] is granted as stated on the record. The defendants shall answer or respond to amended complaint on or before February 8, 2010.
ORDERED: Defendants' oral motion to stay discovery pending the determination of anticipated motions for misjoinder and/or to dismiss is DENIED as stated on the record. Court in Recess 10:22 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:25
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?