Felix v. Denver, City and County of

Filing 100

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 11/5/2009. Defendants 90 Second MOTION to Compel filed October 08, 2009 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to sign medical release form that pertains to the psychotherapy notes. Defendants 75 MOTION to Compel Fed.R.Civ.P.Rule 37 filed September 16, 2009 is GRANTED in part and plaintiff is required to answer each Interrogatory in the format provided on or before December 07, 2009, except for the following: As to Paragraph 10, 10(a) and 10(b) the Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. The Plaintiff is specifically required to answer as to whether she owns any properties, the name(s) of the corporation(s) in which she holds an interest and th e City and State where the property is located. The Plaintiff need not provide the street address for any properties. Ass to Paragraph 10(d) the motion is DENIED. Mr. Wolf is required to submit to [e-mail] a form of propo sed Protective Order on or before November 19, 2009. The request for sanctions is denied. Plaintiffs 80 Opposed: Plaintiff's MOTION for a Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26(c) filed September 25, 2009 is GRANTED and Plaintiff is not required to provide the Defendant a street address. Plaintiffs 78 Opposed: MOTION to Compel filed September 18, 2009 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. (FTR - Debra Brown) (kmtcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02228-MSK-KMT FT R Debra Brown, Deputy Clerk Pro se Plaintiffs. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER Defendants. Robert Wolf

Date: November 05, 2009 MICHELLE FELIX

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 9:42 a.m. Court calls case. Appearance by Plaintiff, pro se and of counsel for Defendant. Defendant's [75] MOTION to Compel Fed.R.Civ.P.Rule 37 filed September 16, 2009 and Defendant's [90] Second MOTION to Compel and for Sanctions filed October 08, 2009 at issue. Argument by parties. ORDERED: Defendant's [90] Second MOTION to Compel filed October 08, 2009 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to sign medical release form that pertains to the psychotherapy notes. Defendant's [75] MOTION to Compel Fed.R.Civ.P.Rule 37 filed September 16, 2009 is GRANTED in part and plaintiff is required to answer each Interrogatory in the format provided on or before December 07, 2009, except for the following: As to Paragraph 10, 10(a) and 10(b) the Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. The Plaintiff is specifically required to answer as to whether she owns any properties, the name(s) of the corporation(s) in which she holds an interest and the City and State where the property is located. The Plaintiff need not provide the street address for any properties. Ass to Paragraph 10(d) the motion is DENIED. ORDERED: Mr. Wolf is required to submit to [e-mail] a form of proposed Protective Order on or before November 19, 2009. The request for sanctions is denied.

ORDERED:

Plaintiff's [80] Opposed: Plaintiff's MOTION for a Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26(c) filed September 25, 2009 at issue. Argument by parties.

08-cv-02228-MSK-KMT November 05, 2009 Page 2 ORDERED: Plaintiff's [80] Opposed: Plaintiff's MOTION for a Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26(c) filed September 25, 2009 is GRANTED and Plaintiff is not required to provide the Defendant a street address.

Plaintiff's [78] Opposed: MOTION to Compel filed September 18, 2009 at issue. Argument by parties. ORDERED: Plaintiff's [78] Opposed: MOTION to Compel filed September 18, 2009 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.

Court in recess: 11:28 a.m. Total In-Court Time 1:46; hearing concluded
* T o obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery W o o d s Reporting at [phone].

Page 2 of 2