Rich Floors, LLC et al v. Jaylon, Inc. et al

Filing 68

ORDER: Granting in part and denying in part 61 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 60 Pretrial Order and for One Day Extension of Time to File Objections filed by Thornton LLC, Jaylon, Inc. GRANTED to set the deadline to file Rule 26(a)(3) objections as December 14, 2009; and DENIED in all other respects, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/6/10. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 08-cv-02291-LTB-BNB RICH FLOORS, LLC, and DAVID SERVICK, Plaintiffs, v. JAYLON, INC., and THORNTON, LLC., Defendants, v. SUZANNE BLAIR, Third-Party Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the Unopposed Motion to Correct the Final Pretrial Order and for One Day Extension of Time to File Objections Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(B) [Doc. # 61, filed 12/11/2009] (the "Motion"). The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion seeks the following: (1) Modification of the final pretrial order to indicate that Rule 26(a)(3) objections are due on or before December 14, 2009; and (2) Modification of the final pretrial order to indicate that the matter will be tried to the court. With respect to the relief sought concerning the Rule 26(a)(3) deadline, the Motion is granted. The final pretrial order correctly reflects, however, that the case has been set by the district judge for a four jury trial. Any modification to that must be sought by the parties from the district judge. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED to set the deadline to file Rule 26(a)(3) objections as December 14, 2009; and DENIED in all other respects. Dated January 6, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?