Martinair, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Company et al

Filing 23

ORDER. Defendant, Cessna Aircraft Company, has filed a Motion to Dismiss 13 in this diversity action. Many of the issues raised are dependant on the applicable law and, as a result, I ORDER that Plaintiff, Martinair, Inc., file a supplemental brie f, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, addressing the choice-of-law determination regarding Colorado or Kansas law, on or before 03/05/2009. I FURTHER ORDER that Defendant, Cessna Aircraft Company, file a supplemental brief in response, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, on or about 03/20/2009. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/18/2009. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-02298-LTB-MEH MARTINAIR, INC., Plaintiff, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, RANDY NEU, BRUCE SIENKO, JAMES KADRMAS, and JOHN DOE(S) #1-10, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Defendant, Cessna Aircraft Company, has filed a Motion to Dismiss [Doc #13] in this diversity action. Many of the issues raised are dependant on the applicable law and, as a result, I ORDER that Plaintiff, Martinair, Inc., file a supplemental brief, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, addressing the choice-of-law determination regarding Colorado or Kansas law, on or before March 5, 2009. I FURTHER ORDER that Defendant, Cessna Aircraft Company, file a supplemental brief in response, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, on or about March 20, 2009. Dated: February 18 , 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge