Superior Choice Credit Union v. Norlarco Credit Union
MINUTE ORDER granting 6 Joint Motion to Modify Case Management Order and Set Agreed Dates. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss on or before February 11, 2009. Defendant may reply within fifteen days of the date Plaintiffs respon se is filed. The Scheduling Conference set in this matter for Friday, January 23, 2009, at 9:45 a.m. is hereby vacated and rescheduled to Friday, February 13, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 203 on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/20/09.(erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02400-CMA-MEH SUPERIOR CHOICE CREDIT UNION, a Wisconsin non-profit corporation credit union, Plaintiff, v. NORLARCO CREDIT UNION, a Colorado non-profit corporation credit union, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 20, 2009. For any future filings, the parties are reminded they must comply with the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of Practice, namely D.C. Colo. LCivR 6.1, 7.1, and 10.1. Any filing not in compliance may be stricken. The Joint Motion to Modify Case Management Order and Set Agreed Dates [filed January 16, 2009; docket #6] is granted. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before February 11, 2009. Defendant may reply within fifteen days of the date Plaintiff's response is filed. The Scheduling Conference set in this matter for Friday, January 23, 2009, at 9:45 a.m. is hereby vacated and rescheduled to Friday, February 13, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 203 on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any counsel, he or she should confer with opposing counsel and my chambers to reschedule the conference to a more convenient date. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling will be entertained unless made five days in advance of the date of appearance. The plaintiff shall notify all parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling/Planning Conference. Lawyers whose offices are located outside of the Denver metropolitan area may appear at scheduling and pretrial conferences by telephone, if the original signed copy of the appropriate order has been submitted. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the parties in this case are to hold a pre-scheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), as amended, on or before February 4, 2009. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), as amended, no discovery shall be submitted until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the district judge in this case.
The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures V.L. on or before February 6, 2009. The proposed Scheduling Order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the ECF Procedures must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., Word or WordPerfect only) and shall be emailed to the Magistrate Judge at Hegarty_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed scheduling order on paper to the Clerk's Office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed scheduling order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the court's website at www.co.uscourts.gov. Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.3C prior to the Scheduling/Planning conference. The parties are further advised that they shall not assume that the court will grant the relief requested in any motion. Failure to appear at a court-ordered conference or to comply with a courtordered deadline which has not be vacated by court order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?