Aguero v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/31/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/30/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/15/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/20/09. (gms, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02465-AP IRENE AGUERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: NICHOLAS D. PURIFOY 5020 Bob Billings Pkwy Lawrence, KS 66049 (785) 832-8521 email@example.com For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-0017 firstname.lastname@example.org 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. Date Complaint Was Filed: 11/12/08 Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 3/6/09 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 5/27/09
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD There are no issues with the accuracy or completeness of the administrative record. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE None anticipated. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES This case does not involve unusually complicated or out-of-the-ordinary claims. 7. OTHER MATTERS None. 8. PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. C. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 8/31/09 Defendant's Response Brief Due: 9/30/09 Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 10/15/09
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. Plaintiff's Statement: Oral Argument not requested. Defendant's Statement: Oral Argument not requested.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. ( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 20th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT: -3-
s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE APPROVED: s/ Nicholas D. Purifoy NICHOLAS D. PURIFOY 5020 Bob Billings Pkwy Lawrence, KS 66049 (785) 832-8521 email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado s/ Thomas H. Kraus THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1961 Stout St., Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 Telephone: (303) 844-0017 firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?