Mayfield v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.

Filing 44

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 36 Plaintiffs Partially Unopposed Combined MOTION to Compel for Expedited Briefing Schedule and Hearing, and for Extension of Discovery Cutoff filed by Carl Mayfield. GRANTED to extend the discovery cutoff to and including September 18, 2009, and to expedite briefing and hearing; and DENIED as moot in all other respects based on the agreements of counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants oral motion to extend the length of the plaintiffs deposition to a total of nine hours is GRANTED. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/23/09. (erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 08-cv-02491-CMA-BNB CARL MAYFIELD, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY & COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on Plaintiff's Partially Unopposed Combined Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, for Expedited Briefing and Hearing On His Motion to Compel, and for Extension of Discovery Cutoff [Doc. # 36, filed 6/8/2009] (the "Motion "). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: · GRANTED to extend the discovery cutoff to and including September 18, 2009, and to expedite briefing and hearing; and · DENIED as moot in all other respects based on the agreements of counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's oral motion to extend the length of the plaintiff's deposition to a total of nine hours is GRANTED. Dated June 23, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?