Grynberg et al v. Ivanhoe Energy, Inc. et al

Filing 166

ORDER granting 152 Motion for Attorney Fees. Judgment shall enter in Robert M. Friedland's favor and against Plaintiff Jack J. Grynberg and his counsel, Roger A. Jatko, jointly and severally, in the amount of $11,432.50 as attorney fee sanction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c), by Judge Walker D. Miller on 7/15/10.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO SENIOR JUDGE WALKER D. MILLER Civil Action No. 08-cv-02528-WDM-BNB JACK J. GRYNBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COTUNDO MINERALES S.A., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to my September 30, 2009 Order on Motion for Sanctions, ECF No. 126, Defendant Robert M. Friedland has submitted his request for attorney fees. ECF No. 152. The request is supported by the declaration of Ty Gee, one of Defendant Friedland's attorneys, and the affidavit of Roger P. Thomasch, opining as to the reasonableness of the fee request. Although allowed pursuant to my September 30, 2009 order, Plaintiffs have not responded or objected to the request by Defendant Friedland for payment of $11,432.50. Indeed, the affidavit of Plaintiffs' expert, Michael H. Berger, opines that the hourly rates charged by Defendant Friedland's attorneys are reasonable and he does not challenge the hours claimed. See affidavit of Michael H. Berger, ECF NO. 162-2 at p. 6. Accordingly, and being sufficiently advised in the premises, Defendant's request, ECF No. 152, is granted and judgment shall enter in Robert M. Friedland's favor and against Plaintiff Jack J. Grynberg and his counsel, Roger A. Jatko, jointly and severally, in the amount of $11,432.50 as attorney fee sanction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c). DATED at Denver, Colorado, on July 15, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Walker D. Miller United States Senior District Judge PDF FINAL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?