Grynberg et al v. Ivanhoe Energy, Inc. et al

Filing 198

ORDER granting 197 Motion to Dismiss: Defendants' claim for appellate attorneys fees and costs is dismissed with prejudice, and this case is closed. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/26/12.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 08-cv-02528-CMA-BNB JACK J. GRYNBERG, an individual, COTUNDO MINERALES S.A., an Ecuadorian company, RSM PRODUCTION CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, and ARCHIDONA MINERALES, S.A., a Panama corporation, Plaintiffs, v. IVANHOE ENERGY, INC., a Canadian corporation, IVANHOE ENERGY LATIN AMERICA, INC., a Canadian corporation, IVANHOE ENERGY ECUADOR, INC., a Canadian corporation, ROBERT M. FRIEDLAND, an individual, DAVID R. MARTIN, an individual, JOSE FABRICIO CORREA DELGADO, an Ecuadorian citizen, and JOHN DOES 1-10, potential assignees of Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc., Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS This matter is before the Court on Defendants Ivanhoe Energy Inc.’s, Ivanhoe Energy Latin America Inc.’s, Ivanhoe Energy Ecuador Inc.’s, Robert M. Friedland’s, and David R. Martin’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Unopposed Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice Defendants’ Claim for Appellate Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Doc. # 197). Having considered the submissions of the parties and the agreed resolution noted in Defendants’ motion, the Court hereby GRANTS the Unopposed Motion and ORDERS that Defendants’ claim for appellate attorneys’ fees and costs be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. There being no further matters or claims before the Court, this case is hereby CLOSED in its entirety. SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2012 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?