Bradshaw v. Lappin et al

Filing 104

Minute ORDER denying 102 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Summary Judgement, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/2/10.(lyg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02542-PAB-KLM JOSEPH BRADSHAW, Plaintiff, v. DR. LEYBA, DR. NAFZIGER, 2-13-06 JANE/JOHN DOE UTILIZATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS, DR. ROBIN H. AMIRKHAN, 4-16-07 JANE/JOHN DOE UTILIZATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS, and PA OSAGIE, Defendant(s). _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Summary Judgement [Docket No. 102; Filed July 26, 2010] (the "Motion"). Defendants move to strike Plaintiff's response to the summary judgment motion on the ground that it is thirty-nine pages long, in violation of District Judge Philip A. Brimmer's Practice Standards. The Court notes that because Plaintiff's response is hand-written, it is difficult to determine the number of pages that would result if the document was typewritten. D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1D provides that pro se litigants are not required to file typewritten pleadings. Given Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will not strike the response. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Dated: August 2, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?