Estate of James Stewart, The v. Daugherty et al

Filing 58

ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Granting 57 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Defendants. Party Trina Seefeldt; David Carroll and Sharon Hughes dismissed as parties and all claims against them are dismissed with prejudice, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/9/09.(gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 08-cv-02564-PAB-CBS THE ESTATE OF JAMES STEWART, by and through RICHARD and BARBARA STEWART, Personal Representatives, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT DONALD DAUGHERTY, Denver Sheriff Department, AMY MARTIN, M.D., Chief Medical Examiner, Office of the Medical Examiner, GILLIAM YOUTH SERVICES CENTER, DENVER COUNTY JAIL, DENVER SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE MEDICAL EXAMINER, and CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE _____________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court upon the plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Defendants Trina Seefeldt, Detective David Carroll, and Detective Sharon Hughes [Docket No. 57]. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised in the premises. It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss defendants [Docket No. 57] is GRANTED. Defendants Trina Seefeldt, Detective David Carroll, and Detective Sharon Hughes are dismissed as parties to this action and all claims against these defendants are dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the parties to this action shall utilize the case caption included in this Order, omitting Trina Seefeldt, Detective David Carroll, and Detective Sharon Hughes, in all future papers filed with the Court. DATED March 9, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?