Yakama Nation Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al

Filing 39

ORDER REGARDING INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Memorandum Opinion and Order filed August 31, 2012, in Fort Peck Housing Authority v. HUD et al., Civil Action No. 05-cv-00018-RPM, is hereby incorporated as an order governing common iss ues in this action; it is FURTHER ORDERED that a coordinated hearing will held at a time to be scheduled for the purpose of addressing procedures for determining issues remaining in this action. All counsel representing the parties must be personally present at the hearing, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/31/2012. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 08-cv-02570-RPM YAKAMA NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, DEBORAH A. HERNANDEZ, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, and DEBORAH LALANCETTE, Director, Office of Grants Management, Office of Native American Programs, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Defendants. ORDER REGARDING INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Memorandum Opinion and Order filed August 31, 2012, in Fort Peck Housing Authority v. HUD et al., Civil Action No. 05-cv-00018-RPM, is hereby incorporated as an order governing common issues in this action; it is FURTHER ORDERED that a coordinated hearing will held at a time to be scheduled for the purpose of addressing procedures for determining issues remaining in this action. All counsel representing the parties must be personally present at the hearing. DATED: August 31, 2012 BY THE COURT: s/ Richard P. Matsch Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?