Conkleton v. Zavaras et al

Filing 99

Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 97 Notice and Motion to Quash. Plaintiff may re-file a complete and signed motion by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/16/09.(jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02612-WYD-MEH JAMES K. CONKLETON, Plaintiff, v. ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), JOE STOMMEL, in his official capacity as the Program Administrator of the Sex Offender Treatment and Monitoring Program (SOTMP) for the CDOC, JOHN P. MCGILL, in his individual and official capacities as Treatment Provider for the SOTMP, BONNIE CANTU, in her individual and official capacities as Treatment Provider for the SOTMP, JAMES LANDER, in his individual and official capacities as Treatment Provider for the SOTMP, ED MURO, in his individual and official capacities as a Correctional Officer I for the CDOC, RICHARD DEGROOT, in his individual and official capacities as a Case Manager for the CDOC, CATHIE HOLST, in her official capacity as Manager for the Office of Correctional Legal Services for the CDOC, THOMAS MISEL, in his individual and official capacities as Case Manager Supervisor, CDOC, AL ESTEP, in his official capacity as the Warden of the CDOC's Fremont Correctional Facility, and RICHARD LIND, in his individual and official capacities as a Correctional Officer V, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 16, 2009. Plaintiff's Combined Notice and Motion to Quash [filed October 14, 2009; docket #97], is denied without prejudice. The document is only one page long and appears to be incomplete, particularly because the request for relief is unclear and the Plaintiff has not signed the document. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a) (2009). Therefore, the Plaintiff may re-file a complete and signed motion.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?