Darris v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 105

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 1/13/2010. Denying 91 MOTION for an Order Compelling Discovery, by Plaintiff. Plaintiffs oral Motion to Dismiss, without prejudice, is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs oral Motion for a hearing before District Judge Brimmer is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff is advised by the Court to file an appropriate written Motion to Dismiss with the Court. (FTR - Debra Brown.) (kmtcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 08-cv-02624-PAB-KMT FT R Debra Brown, Deputy Clerk Pro se (Telephone) Plaintiff. v. PUGLIESE, et al. ROY, LPN Defendant. Suzanne Fasing John Baker Date: January 13, 2010 STEPHAN DARRIS, COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 3:20 p.m. Court calls case. Appearance by plaintiff, pro se and of Counsel. Opening statements by the Court. Plaintiff's [91] Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery filed November 25, 2009 at issue Statements by Mr. Darris. Statements by Ms. Fasing. ORDERED: Plaintiff's [91] Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery filed November 25, 2009 is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record. Oral request by Plaintiff to dismiss the entire case, without prejudice. Plaintiff's Oral Motion for a Hearing before District Judge Brimmer. ORDERED: Plaintiff's oral Motion to Dismiss, without prejudice, is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Oral Motion for a hearing before District Judge Brimmer is DENIED w ithout prejudice. ORDERED: ORDERED: Plaintiff is advised by the Court to file an appropriate written Motion to Dismiss with the Court. Court in recess: 4:08 p.m. Total In-Court Time 0:48; hearing concluded

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?