Darris v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 32

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 3/26/2009. Granting 25 Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5). Ms. Haas hereby accepts service on behalf of the Defendant, Roy, LPN, as of today's date. Clerk shall correct the name of the Defendant Roy, LPN, to LPN Roy Robinson. Defendant's Answer to the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 5) is due as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Court Reporter FTR- Debra Brown.) (ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 08-cv-02624-PAB-KMT FT R Debra Brown, Deputy Clerk Pro se (No Appearance) Plaintiff. v. PUGLIESE, et al. ROY, LPN Defendant. Suzanne Fasing Felice Haas Date: March 26, 2009 STEPHAN DARRIS, COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 9:23 a.m. Court calls case. Appearance of counsel. There is no appearance by the plaintiff, pro se. Discussion by the Court and Counsel regarding Defendant's [25] MOTION to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) filed February 19, 2009. Statements by Ms. Haas. ORDERED: Defendant's MOTION to Quash Service of Process Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) [Document #25, filed February 19, 2009) is GRANTED. Ms. Haas hereby accepts service on behalf of the Defendant, Roy, LPN, as of today's date. The Clerk of the Court is directed to correct the name of the Defendant Roy, LPN, to LPN Roy Robinson. The Defendant's Answer to the Amended Complaint [Document #5, filed December 24, 2008] is due as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDERED: ORDERED: Court in recess : 9:28 a.m. Total In-Court Time 0:05; hearing concluded * T o obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery W o o d s Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?