Kratter v. Defendant Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado et al
Filing
208
ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Conclusion as a Matter of Law Re: the Defenseof Failure To Mitigate 117 filed 04/01/2010, is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for Conclusion as a Matter of Law Regarding the Comparison of Fault With Plaintiff 118 filed 04/01/2010, is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/12/2010.(sah, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 08-cv-02709-REB-BNB GIACOMO KRATTER, Plaintiff, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO, doing business as CENTURA HEALTH-SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER and ST. ANTHONY SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, a Colorado corporation, STEADMAN HAWKINS CLINIC, PROFESSIONAL, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, MARY I. BRYAN, and THOMAS R. HACKETT, M.C., Defendants. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CONCLUSIONS AS A MATTER OF LAW Blackburn, J. The matters before me are (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Conclusion as a Matter of Law Re: the Defense of Failure To Mitigate [#117] filed April 1, 2010; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Conclusion as a Matter of Law Regarding the Comparison of Fault With Plaintiff [#118] filed April 1, 2010. Because both motions are evidence-driven, and, therefore, inappropriate for pretrial resolution, I deny them. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Plaintiff's Motion for Conclusion as a Matter of Law Re: the Defense of Failure To Mitigate [#117] filed April 1, 2010, is DENIED; and
2. That Plaintiff's Motion for Conclusion as a Matter of Law Regarding the Comparison of Fault With Plaintiff [#118] filed April 1, 2010, is DENIED. Dated July 12, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
