McGraw v. Los Arcos, Mexican Restaurant Inc. et al

Filing 55

ORDER. The Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc. Only 54 filed 01/18/2010, is APPROVED. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc.,are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Defendant, Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc., is DROPPED as a party to this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly.By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/19/2010. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 08-cv-02710-REB-MEH NATHAM M. McGRAW, individually, Plaintiff, v. LOS ARCOS MEXICAN RESTAURANT, INC., a Colorado corporation, REAR INN LOUNGE, INC., a Colorado corporation, LUEVANO IGNACIO LIVING TRUST, and LUEVANO ADELLA LIVING TRUST, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING A PARTY Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc. Only [#54] filed January 18, 2010. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that the plaintiff's claims against defendant, Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc., should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc. Only [#54] filed January 18, 2010, is APPROVED; 2. That plaintiff's claims against defendant, Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs; and 3. That defendant, Los Arcos Mexican Restaurant, Inc., is DROPPED as a party to this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly. Dated January 19, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?