BIOTA Brands of America, Inc. et al v. USP Capital Business Credit

Filing 37

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 35 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order, and the Stipulated Protective Order is refused by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/25/09.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02795-MSK-MEH BIOTA BRANDS OF AMERICA, INC., a corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of Colorado, and BIOTA PURE, LLC, a corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of Colorado, Plaintiffs, v. UPS CAPITAL BUSINESS CREDIT, a corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of Colorado, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 25, 2009. The Stipulated Motion for Protective Order [filed June 24, 2009; docket #35] is denied without prejudice, and the Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The parties are granted leave to submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), in which the Court required a set time frame within the mechanism by which the parties may challenge the designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89. In this matter, the Court specifically refers the parties to Paragraph Ten of the proposed Stipulated Protective Order. Furthermore, if the parties re-file their motion, they shall also email the proposed Stipulated Protective Order in a usable format, preferably Word Perfect (.wpd), to both the District Judge and the Magistrate Judge.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?