Rogers v. Zavares et al

Filing 53

MINUTE ORDER denying 30 plaintiffs Motion to Preserve Evidence Motion for Order; denying 32 plaintiffs Motion to Preserve Evidence Motion for Order by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/20/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-02821-WYD-MJW ROBERT R. ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, et al., Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence (Docket No. 32) is denied. As noted by defendants in their response (Docket No. 51), plaintiff's motion is not directed toward any of the defendants but to a non-party, the Colorado Department of Corrections. Furthermore, none of the individually-named defendants are apparently custodians of the things that plaintiff wishes to have preserved. The court notes, however, that defense counsel stated his willingness to forward plaintiff's motion to appropriate personnel in the Colorado Department of Corrections to see whether the items plaintiff wishes to be preserved in fact exist and whether the same can be preserved. Based upon this representation, it is hereby ORDERED that defense counsel, Mr. Farry, shall forward plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence (Docket No. 32) to appropriate personnel within the Colorado Department of Corrections and on or before June 15, 2009, Mr. Farry shall report back to the court whether the Colorado Department of Corrections has responded as to whether such items plaintiff wishes to preserve in fact exist and whether the Colorado Department of Corrections will preserve the same. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion Requesting Case be Moved to Expedited Docket (Docket No. 30) is denied. The court does not have an expedited docket per se. Nevertheless, the court finds no basis for moving forward with this case any differently than it would in the normal course. Date: May 20, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?