AAA National Maintenance et al v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 152

MINUTE ORDER striking 149 Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Aid of Court and Request to Reopen Settlement Agreement Pursuant to [sic] Violation of Federal Civil Rights Laws and Federal Statutes," by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/5/2011. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00007-REB-MEH
AAA NATIONAL MAINTENANCE, a Georgia corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation, and
DENVER DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION, a Department of the City and County of Denver,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 5, 2011.
Plaintiff’s “Motion Requesting Aid of Court and Request to Reopen Settlement Agreement
Pursuant to [sic] Violation of Federal Civil Rights Laws and Federal Statutes” [filed September 30,
2011; docket #149] is stricken. Plaintiff filed the motion pro se; however, the record reflects that
Plaintiff has been, and continues to be, represented by counsel in this case. Pro se filings are
improper if the party is represented by counsel at the time of filing. Dodge v. Shoemaker, 695 F.
Supp. 2d 1127, 1132 (D. Colo. 2010) (citing Lee v. Imperial Lending, LLC, No. 06-cv-02388-ZLW,
2007 WL 3090800 (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2007) (“Parties represented by counsel may not file papers pro
se.”) and Durham v. Lappin, No. 05-cv-01282-MSK, 2006 WL 2724091 (D. Colo. Sept. 21, 2006)
(“the Court will not entertain pro se motions by a party who is represented by counsel.”)).