AAA National Maintenance et al v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 90

ORDER. The Motion To Dismiss Charyn Billick As A Named Defendant and Certification of Compliance With D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(A) 89 filed 11/04/2009, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against defendant Charyn Billick are DISMISSED. Defendant Charyn Billick is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/05/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-00007-REB-MEH AAA NATIONAL MAINTENANCE, a Georgia corporation, and DANA MAYFIELD, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation, DENVER DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION, a Department of the City and County of Denver, KENTON JANZEN, in his official capacity as Denver's Buyer, and in his individual capacity, APRIL HENDERSON, in her official capacity as Denver's Contract Maintenance Manager, and in her individual capacity, RUTH RODRIGUEZ, and CHARYN BILLICK Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT, CHARYN BILLICK, ONLY Blackburn, J. The matter before me is plaintiff's Motion To Dismiss Charyn Billick As A Named Defendant and Certification of Compliance With D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(A) [#89] filed November 4, 2009. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that plaintiffs' claims against defendant Charyn Billick should be dismissed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Motion To Dismiss Charyn Billick As A Named Defendant and Certification of Compliance With D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(A) [#89] filed November 4, 2009, is GRANTED; 2. That plaintiffs' claims against defendant Charyn Billick are DISMISSED; and 3. That defendant Charyn Billick is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated November 5, 2009, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?