USA v. CEMEX, Inc.
Filing
143
MINUTE ORDER denying 139 Defendant's Motion for Temporary Stay of Expert Discovery and the Dispositive Motion Deadline Pending Resolution of CEMEX's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Rebuttal Disclosures, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/15/2011. (mehcd)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00019-MSK-MEH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CEMEX, INC.,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on July 15, 2011.
Defendant’s Motion for a Temporary Stay of Expert Discovery and the Dispositive Motion
Deadline Pending Resolution of CEMEX’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Expert Rebuttal Disclosures
[filed July 14, 2011; docket #139] is denied. If, after the adjudication of Defendant’s motion to
strike, the Court determines that additional expert discovery is necessary, or expert discovery
already conducted was unnecessary, the Court will employ remedial measures (cost shifting, etc.)
to alleviate any prejudice caused.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
