Marker v. Wilner

Filing 20

ORDER. The Court has reviewed the 19 Recommendation de novo as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and accepts and adopts it in its entirety. Petitioners Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2241 2 is denied. This action is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 01/27/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Zita Leeson Weinshienk Civil Action No. 09-cv-00025-ZLW-MEH JASON LEE MARKER, Applicant, v. J.M. WILNER, Warden, FCI - Florence, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ The matter before the Court is Petitioner's Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 2). This case was referred in its entirety to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1C. On December 16, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued his Recommendation that Petitioner's application be denied (Doc. No. 19). Neither party filed objections to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation de novo as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and accepts and adopts it in its entirety. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Petitioner's Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 2) is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 27th day of January, 2010. BY THE COURT:

________________________________ ZITA LEESON WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court

2