COPIC Insurance Company v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
ORDER denying 151 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Its Motion for a Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/15/2010.(wjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-00041-WDM-BNB COPIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Reply In Support of Its Motion for a Protective Order [Doc. # 151, filed 3/15/2010] (the "Motion"). The Motion seeks leave to file a reply "so as to better inform the Court of the appropriate issues and analysis." That is the purpose of the hearing on March 17, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Dated March 15, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?