COPIC Insurance Company v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 238

ORDER: granting 235 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines and Continue theJune 9 Hearing. Dispositive Motions due by 8/2/2010. Wells Fargo shall produce a Rule 30(b)(6) witness consistent with my Order [Doc. # 215] on or before June 25, 2010; Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiffs Revised Motion for Leave to Add a Prayer for Punitive Damages (the Motion to Amend) on or before June 25, 2010. Motion Hearing reset for 6/30/2010 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/26/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-00041-WDM-BNB COPIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines and Continue the June 9 Hearing [Doc. # 235, filed 5/20/2010] (the "Motion"). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: The dispositive motion deadline is extended to and including August 2, 2010; Wells Fargo shall produce a Rule 30(b)(6) witness consistent with my Order [Doc. # 215] on or before June 25, 2010; Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff's Revised Motion for Leave to Add a Prayer for Punitive Damages (the "Motion to Amend") on or before June 25, 2010; and The hearing on the Motion to Amend set for June 9, 2010, at 4:00 p.m., is VACATED and RESET to June 30, 2010, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Dated May 26, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?