Stavaski v. Sun Microsystems, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 81 Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from DefendantSun Microsystems, Inc. Granting in part and denying in part 89 Joint Motion to Continue All Existing Deadlines By 30 Days. Dispositive Motions extended to and including 1/18/2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/11/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-00077-REB-BNB MARK STAVASKI, Plaintiff, v. SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., and DAVID PROFOZICH, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendant Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Doc. # 81, filed 12/23/2009] (the "Motion to Compel"); and (2) The parties' Joint Motion to Continue All Existing Deadlines By 30 Days [Doc. # 89, filed 1/5/2010] (the "Motion for Extension"). I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel [Doc. # 81] is GRANTED to require Sun Microsystems to produce the spreadsheet identified in an e-mail string bearing Bates # SUN/Stavaski 00121. Sun Microsystems must produce the document, if it is in its possession, custody, or control, on or before January 15, 2010, at 5:00 p.m. The Motion to Compel is DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension [Doc. # 89] is GRANTED to extend the dispositive motion deadline to and including January 18, 2010, and is DENIED in all other respects. Dated January 11, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?