Big O Tires, LLC v. Gaskin Enterprises, Inc. et al

Filing 92

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Granting 91 Stipulation and Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation Resolving Case. The Permanent Injunction entered May 28, 2009 67 shall remain in place. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all remaining claims asserted in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/21/10.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Case No. 09-cv-00099-PAB-KLM BIG O TIRES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, f/k/a BIG O TIRES, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. GASKIN ENTERPRISES, INC., an Oregon corporation, and DAVID R. GASKIN, an individual, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE _____________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Stipulation and Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation Resolving Case [Docket No. 91]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. It is ORDERED that the Stipulation and Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation Resolving Case [Docket No. 91] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the permanent injunction entered May 28, 2009 [Docket No. 67] shall remain in place. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all remaining claims asserted in this matter are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. DATED January 21, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?