Gandy v. Zavaras et al

Filing 63

Minute ORDER denying 57 Plaintiffs Motion for Order to Compel. Intheir response to Plaintiffs Motion (Doc. No. 61), Defendants state they are unable to locate any discovery requests sent to them by Plaintiff. In addition, Plaintiff has failed to co mply with D.C.COLO.LcivR 37.1 which requires that the motion set forth verbatim the interrogatory, request, and response to which the motion is directed. As such, Defendants are unable to respond to the discovery requests. Plaintiff may re-send the discovery requests to Defendants.Defendants are ORDERED to provide responses to Plaintiffs discovery requests within two weeks of their receipt of same by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/5/2010.(kmtcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 09­cv­00205­CMA­KMT ROBERT D. GANDY, Plaintiff, v. CATHIE HOLST, and MICHAEL ARRELLANO, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Plaintiff's "Motion for Order to Compel" (Doc. No. 57, filed April 28, 2010) is DENIED. In their response to Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. No. 61), Defendants state they are unable to locate any discovery requests sent to them by Plaintiff. In addition, Plaintiff has failed to comply with D.C.COLO.LcivR 37.1 which requires that the motion "set forth verbatim the interrogatory, request, and response to which the motion is directed." As such, Defendants are unable to respond to the discovery requests. Plaintiff may re-send the discovery requests to Defendants. Defendants are ORDERED to provide responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests within two weeks of their receipt of same. Dated: May 5, 2010