Preacher v. Wiley
MINUTE ORDER denying 192 Motion for Court to Take Judicial Notice, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/3/2009. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00278-CMA-MEH LUKE PREACHER, MIKEAL GLENN STINE, GEORGE SCALF, DAMANI M. NANTAMBU, DAVID BAXTER, and ROBERT UTLEY, Plaintiffs, v. RON WILEY, Warden ADX-Florence, B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden USP Marion, J. FOX, Associate Warden ADX-Florence, MARK COLLINS, Unit Manager ADX-Florence, GEORGE KNOX, Conselor ADX-Florence, J. MANLEY, Lieutenant ADX-Florence, TINA SUDLOW, Case Manager ADX-Florence, CORR. OFFICER MANSPEAKER, ADX-Florence, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BREAM, ADX-Florence, J. D. WALTERS, Lieutenant ADX-Florence, CORR. OFFICER BARBARA BATULIS, ADX-Florence, LIEUTENANT C. RIVERS, CAPTAIN KRIST, and JOHN DOE, Unknown Person, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 3, 2009. The Motion for Court to Take Judicial Notice filed by Plaintiff Robert Utley [filed July 30, 2009; docket #192] is denied. First, the Court may only take judicial notice of a fact not subject to reasonable dispute that is capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Fed. R. Evid. 201 (2009). The "facts" set forth in the motion are clearly debatable and Plaintiff has not identified a "source whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." Second, as the Plaintiffs know, to the extent that Plaintiff Utley seeks to add claims to his
Complaint, he must do so in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Finally, to the extent that the Plaintiff seeks a remedy on behalf of his fellow Plaintiffs, such request is stricken. The Court, once again, warns the Plaintiffs that the filing of frivolous or redundant motions, or motions that fail to comply with Court orders, may be grounds for sanctions, including striking such motions or dismissal of this case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?