Preacher v. Wiley

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Plaintiff's Motion to file Second Amended Complaint. Defendants who have been properly served and/or who have waived service in this action shall file an answer or other response to the Second Amended Verified Complaint on or before June 23, 2009. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/24/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00278-CMA-MEH LUKE PREACHER, MIKEAL GLENN STINE, GEORGE SCALF, DAMANI M. NANTAMBU, DAVID BAXTER, and ROBERT UTLEY, Plaintiffs, v. RON WILEY, Warden ADX-Florence, B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden USP Marion, J. FOX, Associate Warden ADX-Florence, MARK COLLINS, Unit Manager ADX-Florence, GEORGE KNOX, Conselor ADX-Florence, J. MANLEY, Lieutenant ADX-Florence, TINA SUDLOW, Case Manager ADX-Florence, CORR. OFFICER MANSPEAKER, ADX-Florence, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BREAM, ADX-Florence, J. D. WALTERS, Lieutenant ADX-Florence, CORR. OFFICER BARBARA BATULIS, ADX-Florence, LIEUTENANT C. RIVERS, CAPTAIN KRIST, and JOHN DOE, Unknown Person, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 24, 2009. In the interests of justice at this early stage of the litigation1 and finding that the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 are met, the Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend [filed April 21, 2009; docket #27] is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Second Amended Verified Complaint found at docket #27-2. Defendants who have been properly served and/or who have waived service in this The United States Attorney's Office and United States Attorney General were only recently served; therefore, the Court perceives no undue prejudice at this early stage. 1 action shall file an answer or other response to the Second Amended Verified Complaint on or before June 23, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?