Shell v. Henderson et al
Filing
1090
Order. Compliance with the 1083 Order is required unless and until either the District Court or this court grants a stay or until the District Court rules on the objection, whichever comes first. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/5/2013. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 09–cv–00309-MSK-KMT
SUZANNE SHELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEONARD HENDERSON,
FAMILIES AT RISK DEFENSE ALLIANCE,
FRANCINE RENEE CYGAN,
ILLINOIS FAMILY ADVOCACY COALITION,
GEORGIA FAMILY RIGHTS, INC.,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FAMILY ADVOCATES,
CONNECTICUT DCF WATCH,
BRENDA SWALLOW, and
RANDALL BLAIR,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on “Defendant Swallow’s Notice of Intent to Appeal
Decision of Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 1083)” [Doc. No. 1089] filed March 4, 2013.
Given the timing of this Notice, which appears to this court to constitute an Objection to
this court’s order [Doc. No. 1083], and the fact that all remaining parties in the case are
appearing pro se, this Court particularly advises the parties as follows:
Motions concerning discovery matters which are non-dispositive pretrial matters
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), if referred to a Magistrate Judge for resolution, may be
reconsidered by the District Court only “where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s
order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Further, the parties are advised that
D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.2 provides
B. Objection to Discovery Order by Magistrate Judge. The filing of an objection,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), to an order by a magistrate judge concerning a
discovery issue does not stay the discovery to which the order is directed. Any
stay of the magistrate judge’s order must be sought and obtained separately by
motion filed initially with the magistrate judge, and if denied, then with the
assigned district court judge. The motion shall be supported by good cause.
Id. (emphasis added). No stay has been sought or obtained in this matter.
Failure to comply with an Order issued by this court can result in sanctions, including
certification of contempt to the District Court and other sanctions, up to and including entry of
judgment against the offending party. Therefore, compliance with the Order [Doc. No. 1083] is
required unless and until either the District Court or this court grants a stay or until the District
Court rules on the objection, whichever comes first.
Dated this 5th day of March, 2013.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?