Shell v. Henderson et al

Filing 395

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 3/11/2010. Plaintiffs 376 MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant Aimee Dutkiewicz and MOTION for Protective Order is DENIED. The Court will not cer tify this issue to the District Court for contempt sanctions. Effective this date forward, the Court will waive the parties compliance with Local Rule 7.1 with respect to conferral pending ruling by the District Judge of the pending motions to dismis s. The Court will assume any motion filed by any party is opposed. There will be no overtures toward settlement by any party in this case, as it is clear to the Court that no party will settle until the pending motions to dismiss have been resolved. The Court will set a settlement conference, if necessary, after the motions to dismiss have been resolved. Parties will be allowed to file motions if they feel an issue needs the Courts attention. However, any party wishing to file a motion must file a Motion to File a Motion. The motion to file a motion must give explanation of the motion to be filed without any attachments or documentation. If the Court grants the filing of a motion, the Court will not allow any party to file responses unless the Court orders them. Any motions, responses or other briefing filed without leave of the Court will be stricken. (FTR - Debra Brown) (kmtcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00309-MSK-KMT FTR Debra Brown, Deputy Clerk Pro se Plaintiff. v. AIMEE DUTKIEWICZ Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 2:04 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances by Suzanne Shell, Plaintiff and Aimee Dutkiewicz, Defendant, pro se. Plaintiff's [376] MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant Aimee Dutkeiwicz and MOTION for Protective Order at issue. Statements by the Court. ORDERED: Plaintiff's [376] MOTION for Sanctions Against Defendant Aimee Dutkiewicz and MOTION for Protective Order is DENIED. The Court will not certify this issue to the District Court for contempt sanctions. Effective this date forward, the Court will waive the parties' compliance with Local Rule 7.1 with respect to conferral pending ruling by the District Judge of the pending motions to dismiss. The Court will assume any motion filed by any party is opposed. There will be no overtures toward settlement by any party in this case, as it is clear to the Court that no party will settle until the pending motions to dismiss have been resolved. The Court will set a settlement conference, if necessary, after the motions to dismiss have been resolved. Parties will be allowed to file motions if they feel an issue needs the Court's attention. However, any party wishing to file a motion must file a "Motion to File a Motion." The motion to file a motion must give explanation of the motion to be Pro se

Date: March 11, 2010 SUZANNE SHELL

ORDERED:

ORDERED:

ORDERED:

filed without any attachments or documentation. If the Court grants the filing of a motion, the Court will not allow any party to file responses unless the Court orders them. Any motions, responses or other briefing filed without leave of the Court will be stricken. Statements by Ms. Shell. Statements by Ms. Dutkiewicz. Court in recess: 2:23 p.m. Total In-Court Time 0:19; hearing concluded
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone].