Rossetti Associates, Inc. v. Santa Fe 125 Denver, LLC et al

Filing 94

Minute Entry for Trial Preparation Conference held before Judge William J. Martinez: ORDERED: The Proposed Motion for Leave to File Motion in Limine 83 is DENIED. The motion was filed late and there was no attempt to demonstrate good cause as to w hy it failed to comply with this Court's Practice Standards. ORDERED:Plaintiff shall submit a written proffer on or before March 23, 2011 as to (1) the precise amount of damages it will be seeking at trial on the negligent misrepresentation clai m; (2) how it intends to prove up those damages; and (3) an analysis of how those damages comport with the relevant case law limiting the monetary relief on negligent misrepresentation tort claims in Colorado. On or before March 28, 2011 the Defenda nts shall file their response to said proffer. ORDERED: Regarding voir dire, counsel have 15 minutes per side. ORDERED: Regarding the appropriateness of the proposed voir dire questions RULING IS RESERVED for trial. ORDERED: On or before Friday, Ma rch 25, 2011 counsel shall submit a stipulated statement of the case jury instruction, making it as simple as possible. ORDERED: RULING IS RESERVED on the proposed jury instructions and verdict form until trial. ORDERED: Defendants are permitted to submit a verdict form with respect to Defendant Santa Fe which it inadvertently omitted in its submissions to the Court. The Court is inclined to give a jury instruction on the elements of the claim of negligent misrepresentation which follows Bedard v. Martin, 100 P.3d 584 (Colo. App. 2004). ORDERED: Plaintiff's proposed punitive damage jury instruction is WITHDRAWN. (Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel) (ltbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez _____________________________________________________________________ Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen Date: March 18, 2011 Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel _____________________________________________________________________ Civil Case No. 09-cv-00338-WJM-BNB ROSSETTI ASSOCIATES, INC., a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff, v. SANTA FE I25 DENVER, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company; JFA MANAGEMENT, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company; and JOSEPH FREED AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, Jeffrey Villanueva Nicole Schram Counsel: David Shea Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES _____________________________________________________________________ TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE 10:00 a.m. Court in Session Appearances Court's comments The Court addresses the Proposed Motion for Leave to File Motion in Limine (Doc No. 83) 10:03 Argument (by Mr. Villanueva) 10:07 Argument (by Mr. Shea) 10:13 Argument by Mr. Villanueva Court's comments ORDERED: The Proposed Motion for Leave to File Motion in Limine (Doc No. 83) is DENIED. The motion was filed late and there was no attempt to demonstrate good cause as to why it failed to comply with this Court's Practice Standards. Court's further comments re proper measure of damages ORDERED: Plaintiff shall submit a written proffer on or before March 23, 2011 as to (1) the precise amount of damages it will be seeking at trial on the negligent misrepresentation claim; (2) how it intends to prove up those damages; and (3) an analysis of how those damages comport with the relevant case law limiting the monetary relief on negligent misrepresentation tort claims in Colorado. On or before March 28, 2011 the Defendants shall file their response to said proffer. Court's comments re trial This case is set for a three-day jury trial April 4, 2011. After the summary judgment ruling, there is only one claim left. Jury selection, opening statements, and all evidence -- opening case by the plaintiff, the case-in-chief by the defendants, any rebuttals ­ shall be completed in two and a half days. The Court anticipates closing arguments will be given right after lunch on Wednesday, the 6th of April, and the case will then go to the jury. Discussion re witnesses Further comments by Mr. Villanueva The Defendants' case is probably a half a day. If Mr. Shea is done by noon or early afternoon on Tuesday, they will be fine. ORDERED: Regarding voir dire, counsel have 15 minutes per side. ORDERED: Regarding the appropriateness of the proposed voir dire questions RULING IS RESERVED for trial. ORDERED: On or before Friday, March 25, 2011 counsel shall submit a stipulated statement of the case jury instruction, making it as simple as possible. ORDERED: RULING IS RESERVED on the proposed jury instructions and verdict form until trial. ORDERED: Defendants are permitted to submit a verdict form with respect to Defendant Santa Fe which it inadvertently omitted in its submissions to the Court. The Court is inclined to give a jury instruction on the elements of the claim of negligent misrepresentation which follows Bedard v. Martin, 100 P.3d 584 (Colo. App. 2004). The Court is strongly disinclined to allow any jury instruction on punitive damages. There was no amendment of the initial Complaint in this action to allege fraud, malice or willful and wanton conduct. Discussion re settlement Mr. Shea's comments Plaintiff withdraws the punitive damage jury instruction. ORDERED: Plaintiff's proposed punitive damage jury instruction is WITHDRAWN. Mr. Villanueva's comments re trial schedule The Court's Practice Standards set forth the trial schedule: Counsel shall be present at 8:00 a.m. on the first day of trial to go over any final matters before trial begins. On subsequent days counsel must be present no later than 8:30 a.m. On all three days the jury will be brought in at 9:00 a.m. 10:29 a.m. Court in Recess Hearing concluded Time: /29

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?