Garcia et al v. Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo et al
MINUTE ORDER granting 80 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 2/4/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 3/2/2010, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/5/09.(ebs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00359-PAB-KLM BONNIE GARCIA, individually and as putative personal representative of the estate of Joshua Garcia, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO, THE STATE OF COLORADO, JOHN DEQUARDO, individually, and JAMES SEWELL, M.D., individually, Defendant(s). _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Docket No. 80; October 2, 2009] (the "Motion"). Although discovery is stayed as to Defendants Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo and the State of Colorado ("State Defendants") [Docket No. 76], and I note that Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss her claims against State Defendants [Docket No. 71], all Defendants request to extend certain case deadlines in order to obtain necessary discovery. Plaintiff does not oppose the relief requested. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order entered on May 14, 2009 [Docket No. 26] is amended to extend the following case deadlines: · · · · Expert Disclosure Deadline Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline Discovery Deadline Dispositive Motions Deadline December 1, 2009 January 11, 2010 February 4, 2010 March 2, 2010
The Court notes that despite the fact that State Defendants joined in the filing of this Motion, the above deadlines do not apply to State Defendants during the pendency of the stay. Should State Defendants wish to participate in discovery, they may do so only via leave of Court. Dated: October 5, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?