Janssen v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. et al

Filing 40

Order Deeming Motion of Ronald Janssen for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 moot and vacating 5/28/09, Hearing Session signed by the Clerk of the Panel and filed 5/7/09 with MDL Clerk's Office re: 15 Letter. (lam, )

Download PDF
May 07, 2009 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: OPPENHEIMER CHAMPION INCOME FUND SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL No. 2062 ORDER DEEMING MOTION MOOT AND VACATING THE MAY 28, 2009, HEARING SESSION Before the Panel is a motion by Ronald Janssen seeking centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, of the actions on the attached Schedule A in the District of Colorado for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The Panel has now been advised that the three Southern District of New York actions on the attached Schedule A have been dismissed pursuant to notices of voluntary dismissal, thus depriving this litigation of its multidistrict character. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion of Ronald Janssen for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on April 23, 2009, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter. FOR THE PANEL: Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel IN RE: OPPENHEIMER CHAMPION INCOME FUND SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL No. 2062 SCHEDULE A District of Colorado Ronald J. Janssen v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-386 Helga Peters v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-525 Southern District of New York Josh Estner v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-1327 Alexander Hartley v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-1982 Benjamin Hanks v. OppenheimerFunds, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:09-2006

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?